Shared Weather Issue
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:31 pm
Hello Peter,
In our group, we encounter a problem in the management of the weather during our network flights.
For example, all participants in a flight click on the "weather" box of the flight organizer so that everyone has the same weather.
The organizer takes off. The wind is calm. It climbs to FL150 and its weather changed the wind to 30 knts.
At this point, the other members recover the wind at 30 knts while they wait on the taxiway permission to take off.
I deduce that JoinFS transmits the weather related to the position and altitude of the plane that shares its weather.
For example, a pilot at LFQQ has the same weather as another driver at LFML.
The idea is to have in JoinFs the possibility of a global option that recovers all the metars of the globe via servers of type NOAA, VATSIM or IVAO.
This weather would then be injected into FSX using joinFS. This option would complement the weather sharing that is already implemented.
I hope I have been clear enough in my explanations.
What do you think?
Best regards,
Stéphane
In our group, we encounter a problem in the management of the weather during our network flights.
For example, all participants in a flight click on the "weather" box of the flight organizer so that everyone has the same weather.
The organizer takes off. The wind is calm. It climbs to FL150 and its weather changed the wind to 30 knts.
At this point, the other members recover the wind at 30 knts while they wait on the taxiway permission to take off.
I deduce that JoinFS transmits the weather related to the position and altitude of the plane that shares its weather.
For example, a pilot at LFQQ has the same weather as another driver at LFML.
The idea is to have in JoinFs the possibility of a global option that recovers all the metars of the globe via servers of type NOAA, VATSIM or IVAO.
This weather would then be injected into FSX using joinFS. This option would complement the weather sharing that is already implemented.
I hope I have been clear enough in my explanations.
What do you think?
Best regards,
Stéphane